I'm currently still on StoreKit 1, and am testing the paymentQueueShouldShowPriceConsent delegate function. In my local .storekit file, I have a renewable subscription set up with a promotional offer. My test flow is as follows: User subscribes to renewable subscription Let subscription auto-renew once or twice User subscribes to renewable subscription with promotional offer with significant price reduction Promotional offer lapses and price increases to normal Expect paymentQueueShouldShowPriceConsent delegate function to trigger However, #5 never does get invoked, despite re-trying the subscription and promotional offers in various configurations. Manually triggering the Request Price Increase Consent option in the Xcode StoreKit transactions list does invoke the delegate function, but letting the promotional offer lapse does not. My storefront is set to Korea, and my simulator region is set to Korea as well. According to the documentation here and here, consent is required for all price increases in Korea. Is there some way I could check if things are working as intended?

In core-data I have a contact and location entity. I have one-to-many relationship from contact to locations and one-to-one from location to contact. I create contact in a seperate view and save it. Later I create a location, fetch the created contact, and save it while specifying the relationship between location and contact contact and test if it actually did it and it works. viewContext.perform { do { // Set relationship using the generated accessor method currentContact.addToLocations(location) try viewContext.save() print("Saved successfully. Locations count:", currentContact.locations?.count ?? 0) if let locs = currentContact.locations { print("📍 Contact has \(locs.count) locations.") for loc in locs { print("➡️ Location: \(String(describing: (loc as AnyObject).locationName ?? "Unnamed"))") } } } catch { print("Failed to save location: \(error.localizedDescription)") } } In my NSManagedObject class properties I have this : for Contact: @NSManaged public var locations: NSSet? for Location: @NSManaged public var contact: Contact? in my persistenceController I have: for desc in [publicStore, privateStore] { desc.setOption(true as NSNumber, forKey: NSPersistentStoreRemoteChangeNotificationPostOptionKey) desc.setOption(true as NSNumber, forKey: NSPersistentHistoryTrackingKey) desc.setOption(true as NSNumber, forKey: NSMigratePersistentStoresAutomaticallyOption) desc.setOption(true as NSNumber, forKey: NSInferMappingModelAutomaticallyOption) desc.setOption(true as NSNumber, forKey: "CKSyncCoreDataDebug") // Optional: Debug sync // Add these critical options for relationship sync desc.setOption(true as NSNumber, forKey: "NSPersistentStoreCloudKitEnforceRecordExistsKey") desc.setOption(true as NSNumber, forKey: "NSPersistentStoreCloudKitMaintainReferentialIntegrityKey") // Add this specific option to force schema update desc.setOption(true as NSNumber, forKey: "NSPersistentStoreRemoteStoreUseCloudKitSchemaKey") } When synchronization happens on CloudKit side, it creates CKRecords: CD_Contact and CD_Location. However for CD_Location it creates the relationship CD_contact as a string and references the CD_Contact. This I thought should have come as REFERENCE On the CD_Contact there is no CD_locations field at all. I do see the relationships being printed on coredata side but it does not come as REFERENCE on cloudkit. Spent over a day on this. Is this normal, what am I doing wrong here? Can someone advise?

For our outdoor power supply company that builds public WiFi networks at camping sites, we want to implement the following features in our app: Scan surrounding WiFi networks When detecting specific public WiFi SSIDs, provide users with corresponding passwords Automatically connect to those WiFi networks Regarding the NEHotspotHelper API permission application, when I clicked on https://developer.apple.com/contact/request/network-extension, it redirected me to https://developer.apple.com/unauthorized/. I'm not sure where to properly apply for this permission now.

Hi everyone, I’m working with the ManagedSettingsStore API for managing Screen Time restrictions and I have a specific question: Is it possible for an app to block itself using ManagedSettingsStore() — for example, by applying an application category restriction or setting a specific block on its own bundle ID? If so, what strategies or best practices are recommended to avoid accidentally blocking the app itself while applying restrictions to other apps or categories? I haven’t found any official documentation confirming whether the system prevents self-blocking automatically or if this is something developers need to manage explicitly. Thanks for any clarification or advice you can provide!

I am using NFC when the phone is near the NFC reader times below the error： 2024-07-15 15:43:03.608427+0800 TestNFC[16022:1038141] [xpc.exceptions] <NSXPCConnection: 0x282ba90e0> connection to service with pid 58 named com.apple.nfcd.service.corenfc: Exception caught during decoding of received selector didDetectExternalReaderWithNotification:, dropping incoming message. Exception: Exception while decoding argument 0 (#2 of invocation): Exception: decodeObjectForKey: class "NFFieldNotification" not loaded or does not exist my code: #import <CoreNFC/CoreNFC.h> @interface ViewController ()<NFCTagReaderSessionDelegate> @property (strong, nonatomic) NFCTagReaderSession *session; @end @implementation ViewController - (void)viewDidLoad { [super viewDidLoad]; // Do any additional setup after loading the view. self.view.backgroundColor = [UIColor whiteColor]; if (@available(iOS 13.0, *)) { // 初始化 NFC 设置代理 NFCTagReaderSessionDelegate if (NFCNDEFReaderSession.readingAvailable) { self.session = [[NFCTagReaderSession alloc] initWithPollingOption:NFCPollingISO14443 delegate:self queue:nil]; // NFC 显示提示信息 self.session.alertMessage = @"准备扫描，请将卡片贴近手机"; // 开启 NFC [self.session beginSession]; } } else { } } #pragma mark - NFCNDEFReaderSessionDelegate //读取失败回调-读取成功后还是会回调这个方法 - (void)tagReaderSessionDidBecomeActive:(NFCTagReaderSession *)session API_AVAILABLE(ios(13.0)){ NSLog(@"tagReaderSessionDidBecomeActive"); } - (void)tagReaderSession:(NFCTagReaderSession *)session didInvalidateWithError:(NSError *)error API_AVAILABLE(ios(13.0)){ NSLog(@"readerSession:didInvalidateWithError: (%@)", [error localizedDescription]); } - (void)tagReaderSession:(NFCTagReaderSession *)session didDetectTags:(NSArray<__kindof id<NFCTag>> *)tags API_AVAILABLE(ios(13.0)){ }

I have an app I want to get on the App Store but when I was putting in the build version slot, I accidentally deleted it by clicking backspace and tried everything to get it working again but I can't. Is there anyway for me to retrieve the slot so it works?

I'd like to display a list of items to disambiguate for a fulltext search intent. Using the Apple AppIntentsSampleApp, I added TrailSearch.swift: import AppIntents @AssistantIntent(schema: .system.search) struct TrailSearch: AppIntent { static let title: LocalizedStringResource = "Search Trail" static let description = IntentDescription("Search trail by name.", categoryName: "Discover", resultValueName: "Trail") @Parameter(title: "Trail") var criteria: StringSearchCriteria func perform() async throws -> some IntentResult & ReturnsValue<TrailEntity> { if criteria.term.isEmpty { throw $criteria.needsValueError(IntentDialog("need value")) } let trails = TrailDataManager.shared.trails { trail in trail.name.contains(criteria.term) } if trails.count > 1 { throw $criteria.needsDisambiguationError(among: trails.map { StringSearchCriteria(term: $0.name) }) } else if let firstTrail = trails.first { return .result(value: TrailEntity(trail: firstTrail)) } throw $criteria.needsValueError(IntentDialog("Nothing found")) } } Now when I type "trail" which matches several trails and thus lets us enter the disambiguation code path, the Shortcut app just displays the dialog title but no disambiguation items to pick from. Is this by design or a bug? (filed as FB17412220)

I tested it on the app I work with and others I use and the notification message is not appearing when using sleep mode Iphone: 13 mini IOS: 18.4.1

Dear community, Context My company operates in the European Union, where not so long ago there appeared the possibility to accept an ["Alternative Terms Addendum for Apps in the EU"] (https://developer.apple.com/contact/request/download/alternate_eu_terms_addendum.pdf), which, among others, gives us the possibility to use an alternative payment provider, other than Apple's In App Purchase PSP system (ref: Apple docs). My company did accept it and was granted the StoreKit External Purchase Entitlement (com.apple.developer.storekit.external-purchase) entitlement, with which we integrated a different PSP, so now we want to incorporate the reporting to Apple's External Purchase Server API. We are currently integrating with the External Purchase Server API and have encountered a couple of issues I would appreciate clarification on: Question 1 Is there a way to retrieve an overview or summary of the current subscription states on Apple’s servers as a result of the submitted reports to External Purchase Server API? Specifically, I would like to verify the expected outcomes before the monthly invoice is issued by Apple and to understand the subscription states for the test users I used during this process and for future reference as well. Question 2 In one scenario, I initiated a one-year subscription, and in the middle of its period, I submitted a RENEWAL for one month with a higher price. I expected the request to fail due to overlapping periods and/or pricing conflicts, but both submissions were accepted without error. Do you have an idea about: What happens at the end of the renewed month? Will the subscription continue with the renewed (higher) amount, revert to the original (lower) annual rate, or be canceled? Where can I view the final state and billing plan for that subscription? Thank you for your assistance, we are looking forward for any kind of help or information regarding this topic.

For a given date, there are discrepancies between the step counts obtained from HealthKit and those displayed in the Health app. Is it possible for such discrepancies to occur even if step counts are not manually entered and multiple devices are not being used?

We're in the process of migrating our app to the Swift 6 language mode. I have hit a road block that I cannot wrap my head around, and it concerns Core Data and how we work with NSManagedObject instances. Greatly simplied, our Core Data stack looks like this: class CoreDataStack { private let persistentContainer: NSPersistentContainer var viewContext: NSManagedObjectContext { persistentContainer.viewContext } } For accessing the database, we provide Controller classes such as e.g. class PersonController { private let coreDataStack: CoreDataStack func fetchPerson(byName name: String) async throws -> Person? { try await coreDataStack.viewContext.perform { let fetchRequest = NSFetchRequest<Person>() fetchRequest.predicate = NSPredicate(format: "name == %@", name) return try fetchRequest.execute().first } } } Our view controllers use such controllers to fetch objects and populate their UI with it: class MyViewController: UIViewController { private let chatController: PersonController private let ageLabel: UILabel func populateAgeLabel(name: String) { Task { let person = try? await chatController.fetchPerson(byName: name) ageLabel.text = "\(person?.age ?? 0)" } } } This works very well, and there are no concurrency problems since the managed objects are fetched from the view context and accessed only in the main thread. When turning on Swift 6 language mode, however, the compiler complains about the line calling the controller method: Non-sendable result type 'Person?' cannot be sent from nonisolated context in call to instance method 'fetchPerson(byName:)' Ok, fair enough, NSManagedObject is not Sendable. No biggie, just add @MainActor to the controller method, so it can be called from view controllers which are also main actor. However, now the compiler shows the same error at the controller method calling viewContext.perform: Non-sendable result type 'Person?' cannot be sent from nonisolated context in call to instance method 'perform(schedule:_:)' And now I'm stumped. Does this mean NSManageObject instances cannot even be returned from calls to NSManagedObjectContext.perform? Ever? Even though in this case, @MainActor matches the context's actor isolation (since it's the view context)? Of course, in this simple example the controller method could just return the age directly, and more complex scenarios could return Sendable data structures that are instantiated inside the perform closure. But is that really the only legal solution? That would mean a huge refactoring challenge for our app, since we use NSManageObject instances fetched from the view context everywhere. That's what the view context is for, right? tl;dr: is it possible to return NSManagedObject instances fetched from the view context with Swift 6 strict concurrency enabled, and if so how?

My sticker app was rejected when I submitted it to App Store Connect. Reason: "We were unable to locate your stickers in message app after installed your app." When I checked on an iOS18 device, this was correct. However, my stickers is visible when I dragged the half-modal(like sheetPresentationController) part. I hope what I need to do to get the stickers to display initially. My code(Xcode16.2) class StickerViewController: MSStickerBrowserViewController { var stickers = [MSSticker]() override func viewDidLoad() { super.viewDidLoad() loadStickers() } override var stickerSize: MSStickerSize { get { return .small } } func loadStickers() { var imageSetPath = "en" for index in 1...20 { var strIndex = "" strIndex = "stmp" + String(index) + imageSetPath createSticker(assetLocation: "\(strIndex)", assetDescription: "\(strIndex)") } } func createSticker(assetLocation: String, assetDescription: String) { guard let path = Bundle.main.path(forResource: assetLocation, ofType: "png") else { return } let url = URL(fileURLWithPath: path) do { let sticker = try MSSticker(contentsOfFileURL: url, localizedDescription: assetDescription) stickers.append(sticker) } catch { print(error) } } } extension StickerViewController { override func numberOfStickers(in stickerBrowserView: MSStickerBrowserView) -> Int { return stickers.count } override func stickerBrowserView(_ stickerBrowserView: MSStickerBrowserView, stickerAt index: Int) -> MSSticker { return stickers[index] } }

I have multiple app ids that are registered with Push Notification, however they do not hsow up in the Push Notification Console for testing.

Hello all, I am interested in developing a small driver that would facilitate host-to-host communication via Thunderbolt 4/5. While I am aware of features such as Thunderbolt Bridge/Thunderbolt Networking, I find that for my application the overhead is too great. I am interested in sharing a simple, static memory buffer between the two hosts for IO and with some synchronisation primitives. The idea being that the communication is facilitated between different platforms. Would it be possible to develop a driver/service like this? Currently, going through the documentation, to use PCIDriverKit specifying a Vendor and Product Ids is required, so I doubt that this is a viable path. I know that Linux exposes the "XDomain" protocol to announce thunderbolt services (This is the same protocol that is used in macOS to discover Thunderbolt Networking peers). Is this functionality exposed to macOS driver developers?

Hi everyone, We operate an online game where all in-app assets are stored server-side and require a logged-in account (no device binding). I’d like guidance on four areas: Do we really need deviceVerification / deviceVerificationNonce? – Because every purchase is tied to an account and we enforce a global transactionId UNIQUE constraint, replay or cross-account reuse appears infeasible. Under these conditions, is omitting device verification acceptable, or are there situations where Apple still recommends it? Permanent rate-limit increase for the App Store Server API – During anniversary events we saw bursts of ~18 000 requests per hour, breaching the current hourly cap on the App Store Server API (verifyTransaction, getNotificationHistory, etc.). Is there a formal process to request a long-term rate-limit expansion (or an alternative tier) from Apple? When is an App Store Server API call required for a StoreKit 2 jwsRepresentation? Docs say “call the API if you’re unsure,” but there’s no clear cut-off. Because we fully validate the JWS signature plus the entire certificate chain (including CRL/OCSP checks) on our server, local cryptographic validation seems sufficient for consumables. For subscriptions we still plan to hit the API to fetch the latest status. Does this separation match Apple’s best practice? If Apple does recommend hitting the API for consumables as well, we’d like a concrete rule of thumb—e.g. “if the item price is USD 50 or higher, always use the API.” Is establishing such thresholds consistent with Apple’s intent? Refund-risk reduction from Send Consumption Info – Adapty reports a 40–60 % refund-rate drop for subscriptions when using Send Consumption Info (blog reference). Can we expect similar reduction for consumable IAP in social/online games? Any real-world results would be helpful. Thanks in advance for any guidance!

The stuff I've found by searching has confused me, so hopefully someone can help simplify it for me? I have an app (I use it for logging which books I've given away), and I could either add a bunch of things to the app, or I could have another app (possibly a CLI tool) to generate some reports I'd like.

good.load_commands.txt I bad.load_commands.txt have two dylibs built with different parameters on different machines. Both have the same dependency(@rpath/libc++.dylib). When @rpath/libc++.dylib is missing, one of them can still be laoded via dlopen with RTLD_NOW, and I want to understand why. Additional infomation: Both dylibs are the same architecture(arm64) They had identical LC_RPATH settings. But I've removed them via install_name_tool just to simplify the problem. Through otool -l to view load commands, I can't find any differnent between them except they had different libSystem.B.dylib version. And then,I through setting DYLD_PRINT_SEARCHING=1 and load them. I found differenes in their dependency search processes, but' I'm unsure what causes this discrepancy. these are outputs: ./a.out libchrome_zlib.dylib.good dyld[37001]: find path "/usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib" dyld[37001]: possible path(original path on disk): "/usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib" dyld[37001]: possible path(cryptex prefix): "/System/Volumes/Preboot/Cryptexes/OS/usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib" dyld[37001]: possible path(original path): "/usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib" dyld[37001]: found: dylib-from-cache: (0x000A) "/usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib" dyld[37001]: find path "/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib" dyld[37001]: possible path(original path on disk): "/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib" dyld[37001]: possible path(cryptex prefix): "/System/Volumes/Preboot/Cryptexes/OS/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib" dyld[37001]: possible path(original path): "/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib" dyld[37001]: found: dylib-from-cache: (0x00AB) "/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib" dyld[37001]: find path "libchrome_zlib.dylib.good" dyld[37001]: possible path(original path on disk): "libchrome_zlib.dylib.good" dyld[37001]: found: dylib-from-disk: "libchrome_zlib.dylib.good" dyld[37001]: find path "@rpath/libc++.dylib" dyld[37001]: possible path(default fallback): "/usr/local/lib/libc++.dylib" dyld[37001]: possible path(default fallback): "/usr/lib/libc++.dylib" dyld[37001]: found: dylib-from-cache: (0x000A) "/usr/lib/libc++.dylib" ./a.out libchrome_zlib.dylib.bad dyld[41256]: find path "/usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib" dyld[41256]: possible path(original path on disk): "/usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib" dyld[41256]: possible path(cryptex prefix): "/System/Volumes/Preboot/Cryptexes/OS/usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib" dyld[41256]: possible path(original path): "/usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib" dyld[41256]: found: dylib-from-cache: (0x000A) "/usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib" dyld[41256]: find path "/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib" dyld[41256]: possible path(original path on disk): "/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib" dyld[41256]: possible path(cryptex prefix): "/System/Volumes/Preboot/Cryptexes/OS/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib" dyld[41256]: possible path(original path): "/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib" dyld[41256]: found: dylib-from-cache: (0x00AB) "/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib" dyld[41256]: find path "libchrome_zlib.dylib.bad" dyld[41256]: possible path(original path on disk): "libchrome_zlib.dylib.bad" dyld[41256]: found: dylib-from-disk: "libchrome_zlib.dylib.bad" dyld[41256]: find path "@rpath/libc++.dylib" dyld[41256]: not found: "@rpath/libc++.dylib" dlopen failed: dlopen(libchrome_zlib.dylib.bad, 0x0002): Library not loaded: @rpath/libc++.dylib Referenced from: <42E93041-7B58-365B-9967-04AE754AA9F0> /Users/jiangzh/dlopen/libchrome_zlib.dylib.bad Reason: no LC_RPATH's found

My app has been working fine until just recently, now it can not add Matter devices over Thread (Wifi commissioning still works). I didn't change anything on my side, so not sure if an update maybe changed things? In any case, reading through my logs (and i have the matter/thread debug profiles installed). it seems like the device is added to the thread network fine, and it looks to me like the phone is successfully commissioning the device to the Apple setup fabric, but then it seems to choke on this line and i don't think the device is actually added to the keychain/matter db, so it fails later on . error 12:18:03.369036-0700 homed [2610726604/1195614123(679130348)] failed to find metric hmmtrAccessoryMetricNameCommissioningAccessory to complete I can confirm the device does join my thread border router as its pingable, and it does not seem to be in setup mode anymore (light stops flashing), so i assume it thinks its commissioned. The device i'm pairing is a Onvis (matter certified) outlet to an espressif build of a OTBR. My phone is running 18.4.1 if that matters (no pun intended) . I have also cleared out existing Matter pairings from the phone, as well ensured the device was factory reset before every try. Here is a snippet of the log towards the end where is looks like pairing works, but then errors out. I would post more but my post has a 7k character limit. default 12:18:02.836555-0700 homed Success status report received. Session was established default 12:18:02.836734-0700 homed SecureSession[0x9bb100f00, LSID:64711]: State change 'kEstablishing' --> 'kActive' default 12:18:02.837438-0700 homed Successfully finished commissioning step 'kFindOperationalForStayActive' default 12:18:02.837467-0700 homed Commissioning stage next step: 'kFindOperationalForStayActive' -> 'ICDSendStayActive' default 12:18:02.837500-0700 homed Performing next commissioning step 'ICDSendStayActive' default 12:18:02.837574-0700 homed Skipping kICDSendStayActive default 12:18:02.837627-0700 homed Successfully finished commissioning step 'ICDSendStayActive' default 12:18:02.837650-0700 homed Commissioning stage next step: 'ICDSendStayActive' -> 'kFindOperationalForCommissioningComplete' default 12:18:02.837670-0700 homed Performing next commissioning step 'kFindOperationalForCommissioningComplete' default 12:18:02.838036-0700 homed Found an existing secure session to [2:000000009B9C86CC]! default 12:18:02.838149-0700 homed Successfully finished commissioning step 'kFindOperationalForCommissioningComplete' default 12:18:02.838697-0700 homed Commissioning stage next step: 'kFindOperationalForCommissioningComplete' -> 'SendComplete' default 12:18:02.838893-0700 homed Performing next commissioning step 'SendComplete' default 12:18:02.839092-0700 homed <<< [E:35494i S:64711 M:193726318] (S) Msg TX from 0000000086BCA241 to 2:000000009B9C86CC [47A0] [UDP:[fd01:11b8:de1c:1:968a:c465:6fe8:e12a]:5540] --- Type 0001:08 (IM:InvokeCommandRequest) (B:59) default 12:18:02.839133-0700 homed ??1 [E:35494i S:64711 M:193726318] (S) Msg Retransmission to 2:000000009B9C86CC scheduled for 2910ms from now [State:Active II:800 AI:800 AT:4000] default 12:18:02.839257-0700 homed <<< [E:35493i S:0 M:19014618 (Ack:7538941)] (U) Msg TX from 3251BD376C43B658 to 0:0000000000000000 [0000] [UDP:[fd01:11b8:de1c:1:968a:c465:6fe8:e12a]:5540] --- Type 0000:10 (SecureChannel:StandaloneAck) (B:26) default 12:18:03.356373-0700 homed >>> [E:35494i S:64711 M:174417481 (Ack:193726318)] (S) Msg RX from 2:000000009B9C86CC [47A0] to 0000000086BCA241 --- Type 0001:09 (IM:InvokeCommandResponse) (B:70) default 12:18:03.356559-0700 homed Received Command Response Data, Endpoint=0 Cluster=0x0000_0030 Command=0x0000_0005 default 12:18:03.356584-0700 homed Received CommissioningComplete response, errorCode=0 default 12:18:03.356622-0700 homed Successfully finished commissioning step 'SendComplete' default 12:18:03.356648-0700 homed Commissioning stage next step: 'SendComplete' -> 'Cleanup' default 12:18:03.356746-0700 homed Performing next commissioning step 'Cleanup' default 12:18:03.356803-0700 homed Successfully finished commissioning step 'Cleanup' default 12:18:03.356916-0700 homed Closing all BLE connections default 12:18:03.357084-0700 homed Auto-closing end point's BLE connection. default 12:18:03.358146-0700 homed SecureSession[0x9bb1003c0, LSID:64710]: State change 'kActive' --> 'kPendingEviction' default 12:18:03.358652-0700 homed Commissioning complete for node ID 0x000000009B9C86CC: success default 12:18:03.358678-0700 homed <MTRDeviceController_Concrete: 0x9b8e33100, uuid: 3F6C2281-D873-4D82-BE3E-722446EA66E7, suspended: NO> DeviceControllerDelegate Commissioning complete. NodeId 0x000000009b9c86cc Status src/controller/CHIPDeviceController.cpp:2932: Success ... default 12:18:03.367999-0700 homed <MTRDeviceController_Concrete: 0x9b8e33100, uuid: 3F6C2281-D873-4D82-BE3E-722446EA66E7, suspended: NO> 1 delegates called for -[MTRDeviceController controller:commissioningComplete:nodeID:metrics:] error 12:18:03.369036-0700 homed [2610726604/1195614123(679130348)] failed to find metric hmmtrAccessoryMetricNameCommissioningAccessory to complete error 12:18:03.426636-0700 HomeUIService Unexpected accessory setup progress CASE Session Sanity Check Passed default 12:18:03.426850-0700 homed Could not find home with valid fabric ID corresponding to fabric UUID: FB19AA02-5E34-40C5-BB9D-B1B1AF51E08B ... error 12:18:03.460841-0700 homed [188914BD-5163-425C-9E59-CAE9BFA1A288] Could not find system commissioner pairing for newly staged server with identifier f1:64:16:3f:79:b8 in all pairings: ( .. default 12:18:03.460906-0700 homed Answering incoming message HMASC.m.confirmDeviceCredential (186EE57F-330B-435F-A949-0E4C5D6954AB) from client 'HomeUIService' that expects a response with error Error Domain=HMErrorDomain Code=2 "(null)" error 12:18:03.461167-0700 HomeUIService [BD890E19] Failed to stage CHIP accessory pairing in steps: Error Domain=HMErrorDomain Code=2 "(null)" error 12:18:03.462121-0700 HomeUIService -[HSSetupStateMachineCHIPPartnerConfiguration stageCHIPAccessory]_block_invoke Failed to stage CHIP accessory: Error Domain=HMErrorDomain Code=2 "(null)" default 12:18:03.462172-0700 HomeUIService -[HSSetupStateMachineConfiguration setPairingError:] *** Setting pairingError *** = Error Domain=HMErrorDomain Code=2 "(null)"

When performing the P12 certificate sending test, there was an error stating that authentication failed due to the remote party closing the transport stream. May I ask how to solve this?

While implementing the extended adverts scanning, I noticed that фfter some time from the start of scanning(CBCentralManagerScanOptionAllowDuplicatesKey is true), the manufacturer data is duplicated. The first part is the actual data, and the second part is the same bytes that the device sent about 10 seconds before. This replicates on iPhone 11 - 14 but does not work on 16 Pro. I also saw the same behavior in third party BLE scanning applications. We also tried increasing the interval between sending adverts by the device and got the same result Does anyone know what the problem could be?