Bringing my iPad app to Mac Catalyst as iPad idiom. Primary interface is a UISplitViewController. Two things I think are bugs unless someone replies with a fix. SplitViewController is setup in two column with left column as sidebar: split.setViewController(primary, for: .primary) split.setViewController(secondary, for: .secondary) split.preferredDisplayMode = .oneBesideSecondary split.preferredSplitBehavior = .tile split.presentsWithGesture = true #if targetEnvironment(macCatalyst) split.primaryBackgroundStyle = .sidebar split.displayModeButtonVisibility = .never #endif The displayMode button aligns vertically with the navigation bar and below the 3 window control buttons (close, minimize, full screen), whereas on other macOS apps using SplitViewController such as Apple Notes app, the displayMode button aligns vertically and just to the right of the the 3 window control buttons (close, minimize, full screen). I downloaded the Apple Example app called Menus that is supposed to be a prime example of a Mac Catalyst app, and I see author must have faced the same bug and instead created their own displayMode button and placed it on the UITitlebar's toolBar. In my secondary ViewController which is a subclass of a UITableViewController, tapping a row, calls show and in a SplitViewController, that pushes another detailVC onto the Nav stack as expected. The UIWindowScene's UITitlebar which appears over the top of the secondary VC looks correct. This detailVC is a subclass of a UITableViewController. Finally, tapping a row in the table of the detailVC calls show but this time, the ViewController is actually a UIHostingViewController wrapping a SwiftUI View. At this point the UIWindowScene's UITitlebar changes appearance and takes on the same lightened color similar to the sidebar (primary) appearance. With UITitlebarTitleVisibility set to hidden and if I set the titlebar.toolbar to nil, (which removes the UITitlebar, there is no appearance issue. Running on iPad, with no UITitlebar, there is no odd lightening experienced when the UIHostingController is shown. I think this has something to do with the UIHostingController within Mac Catalyst.

I've defined a URL scheme for my application, and that's being honored by iOS. But the function that's supposed to handle the URL in my appliation (as documented here) is never called. The documentation doesn't say exactly where this is supposed to go. I've tried it in my App struct: @main struct MyGreatApp: App { var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { MainView() } } // Handle custom URLs, specifically the ones sent in invitation E-mails or texts. func application(_ application: UIApplication, open theURL: URL, options: [UIApplication.OpenURLOptionsKey : Any] = [:] ) -> Bool { // Determine who sent the URL. let sendingAppID = options[.sourceApplication] print("source application = \(sendingAppID ?? "Unknown")") ... And I also tried putting this at the file level. No dice either way. Anybody have an idea why? To head off things I've seen in other posts: I'm not using scenes, and there's no SceneDelegate.

I have a SwiftUI view that I have wrapped using UIHostingController for use within UIKit. Requirement: Within the UIKit environment, I want to get all the subviews of this SwiftUI view and determine whether the images within those subviews have finished loading. For UIKit views, we can use view.subviews to get all the subviews and do the check. However, for SwiftUI views, I found that the view.subviews turns out to be an empty array, making it impossible to do further checks. So the question is How can I get the subviews of a SwiftUI view?

Hi, I have added widgets to my iOS app and I would like to make this feature only accessible to "pro" users that have made a non-consumable in-app purchase. Currently, I am doing the following: I store an "isUnlocked" property in the Keychain after the purchase is made I read data to be displayed in the widget and here I also query the Keychain and store whether the widget is unlocked I have no refresh policy, but only change the widget data on a significant time change a different view is displayed when the app is locked Some dummy code snippets: func getTimeline(in context: Context, completion: @escaping (Timeline<Entry>) -> Void) { &#9;&#9;let entry = readContents() &#9;&#9;let timeline = Timeline(entries: [entry], policy: .never) &#9;&#9;completion(timeline) } struct WidgetEntryView: View { &#9;&#9;let entry: Provider.Entry     @Environment(\.widgetFamily) var family     @ViewBuilder     var body: some View {         switch family {         case .systemSmall:             if !entry.isUnlocked {                 LockedWidgetView()             } else if let event = entry.event {                 SmallWidgetEventView(event: event)             } else {                 NoDataWidgetView()             } ... func applicationSignificantTimeChange(_ application: UIApplication) { &#9;&#9;if #available(iOS 14.0, *) { &#9;&#9;&#9;&#9;WidgetCenter.shared.reloadAllTimelines() &#9;&#9;} ... However, 2 unexpected things happen: the view is refreshed intraday (not only at midnight i.e. at significant time change) sometimes the LockedWidgetView is displayed. Especially the latter is problematic, because it gives false information to a user that has already made the in-app purchase. How can I achieve my goal of only displaying info when the user has made the in-app purchase? Thanks in advance. P.S. Although it would not have my preference, I would also find it acceptable if the widget is only shown as option to add once the purchase is made. In other words, I was considering changing the Widget itself: struct MyWidget: Widget {     private var supportedFamilies: [WidgetFamily] = isUnlocked() ? [.systemSmall, .systemMedium] : [] but I believe I cannot re-initialise the widget from the app when the user makes the in-app purchase, because the only refresh option that I have is WidgetCenter.shared.reloadAllTimelines()

iPhone16ProMax 通过[UIScreen mainScreen].bounds.size获取屏幕宽高 使用XCode15获取屏幕宽高为430 * 930 使用XCode16获取屏幕宽高为440 * 956 这是为什么？

I am experiencing memory leaks in my iOS app that seem to be related to an issue between UIInputView and _UIInputViewContent. After using the memory graph, I'm seeing that instances of these objects aren't being deallocated properly. The UIInputViewController whichs holds the inputView is being deallocated properly along with its subviews.I have tried to remove all of UIInputViewController's subviews and their functions but the uiInputView is not being deallocated. The current setup of my app is a collectionView with multiple cells,each possessing a textfield with holds a UIInputViewController.When i scroll up or down,the views are being reused as expected and the number of UIInputViewController stays consistent with the number of textfields.However the number of inputView keeps increasing referencing solely _UIInputViewContent. class KeyboardViewController: UIInputViewController { // Callbacks var key1: ((String) -> Void)? var key2: (() -> Void)? var key3: (() -> Void)? var key4: (() -> Void)? private lazy var buttonTitles = [ ["1", "2", "3"], ["4", "5", "6"], ["7", "8", "9"] ] override func viewDidLoad() { super.viewDidLoad() setupKeyboard() } lazy var mainStackView: UIStackView = { let mainStackView = UIStackView() mainStackView.axis = .vertical mainStackView.distribution = .fillEqually mainStackView.spacing = 16 mainStackView.translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints = false return mainStackView }() private func setupKeyboard() { let keyboardView = UIView(frame:CGRect(x: 0, y: 0, width: UIScreen.main.bounds.width, height: 279.0)) keyboardView.addSubview(mainStackView) NSLayoutConstraint.activate([ mainStackView.topAnchor.constraint(equalTo: keyboardView.topAnchor, constant: 16), mainStackView.leadingAnchor.constraint(equalTo: keyboardView.leadingAnchor, constant: 0), mainStackView.trailingAnchor.constraint(equalTo: keyboardView.trailingAnchor, constant: -24), mainStackView.bottomAnchor.constraint(equalTo: keyboardView.bottomAnchor, constant: -35) ]) // Create rows for (_, _) in buttonTitles.enumerated() { let rowStackView = UIStackView() rowStackView.axis = .horizontal rowStackView.distribution = .fillEqually rowStackView.spacing = 1 // Create buttons for each row for title in rowTitles { let button = createButton(title: title) rowStackView.addArrangedSubview(button) } mainStackView.addArrangedSubview(rowStackView) } self.view = keyboardView } private func createButton(title: String) -> UIButton { switch title { ///returns a uibutton based on title } } // MARK: - Button Actions @objc private func numberTapped(_ sender: UIButton) { if let number = sender.title(for: .normal) { key1?(number) } } @objc private func key2Called() { key2?() } @objc private func key3Called() { key3?() } @objc private func key4Called() { key4?() } deinit { // Clear any strong references key1 = nil key2 = nil key3 = nil key4 = nil for subview in mainStackView.arrangedSubviews { if let stackView = subview as? UIStackView { for button in stackView.arrangedSubviews { (button as? UIButton)?.removeTarget(self, action: nil, for: .allEvents) } } } mainStackView.removeFromSuperview() } } Environment iOS 16.3 Xcode 18.3.1 Any insights would be greatly appreciated as this is causing noticeable memory growth in my app over time.

I’m building a macOS app using SwiftUI with a WindowGroup(id: "rootWindow") for the main UI. The app shows a countdown timer, and the timer continues to run even after the user closes the main window (clicks the red "X"). When the timer reaches 0, I want to automatically reopen that window and bring the app to the front. I’m currently using the following code to bring the app to the foreground and show the window when the app is still open (but not focused/resign active state): NSApp.activate(ignoringOtherApps: true) NSApp.windows.forEach { window in if window.identifier?.rawValue.starts(with: "rootWindow") { window.makeKeyAndOrderFront(nil) } } However, this doesn’t work when the window has been closed. At that point, NSApp.windows no longer contains my SwiftUI window, and I have no reference to recreate or reopen it. I also cannot use openWindow environment value as it requires a view. How can I programmatically reopen a SwiftUI WindowGroup window after it’s been closed, without requiring any user interaction (like clicking the Dock icon)?

Is there anything to make a one off screenshot? like cmd+shift+3. But with code? There is ScreenCaptureKit - but it seems to be more for video / audio streams. I thought of trying to get the first frame from the video stream. But it seems to be rather a complex workaround for a simple problem.

Let's say you have a protocol that can work with both classes and structs but you want to have a uniform UI to make edits. What is the recommended way to have one view that will take both? App import SwiftUI @main struct ObservationTesterApp: App { var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView(existence: Existence()) } } } Types import Foundation protocol Dateable { var timestamp:Date { get set } } struct Arrival:Dateable { var timestamp:Date } @Observable class Existence:Dateable { var timestamp:Date init(timestamp: Date) { self.timestamp = timestamp } } extension Existence { convenience init() { self.init(timestamp: Date()) } } ContentView, etc // // ContentView.swift // ObservationTester // // import SwiftUI struct EditDateableView<TimedThing:Dateable>:View { @Binding var timed:TimedThing //note that this currently JUST a date picker //but it's possible the protocol would have more var body:some View { DatePicker("Time To Change", selection: $timed.timestamp) } } #Preview { @Previewable @State var tt = Arrival(timestamp: Date()) EditDateableView<Arrival>(timed: $tt) } struct ContentView: View { @State var arrival = Arrival(timestamp: Date()) @Bindable var existence:Existence var body: some View { //this work around also not allowed. "self is immutable" // let existBinding = Binding<Existence>(get: { existence }, set: { existence = $0 }) VStack { EditDateableView(timed: $arrival) //a Binding cant take a Bindable //EditDateableView<Existence>(timed: $existence) } .padding() } } #Preview { ContentView(existence: Existence()) }

Hi, In a Mac Catalyst app, I need to allow the user insert a passcode using a UITextField. The field is used to insert a one time passcode and I want to keep the content hidden. For this reason I set the isSecureTextEntry property to true. passcodeTextField.isSecureTextEntry = true By doing this, a button to allow the user to pick a password from the keychain is displayed: This option in my case should not appear because the password is a one time password that change every time. For that reason I set the textContentType to oneTimeCode. passcodeTextField.textContentType = .oneTimeCode This actually removes the password button, but introduce something weird. If the user type something and then delete everything, a big empty box appear under the field: I have no idea what this box is and why it appears. Does anyone know why it appears and how I can remove it? Thank you

I have a List in a sidebar style which contains a LazyVGrid and a Section with a simple list contents. Every thing works well except when content increases and layout changes (from two columns to one column) for the LazyVGrid with editMode changing to .active ... LazyVGrid does not expand/resize when the content increases (the increased content gets clipped)...but does when user expands/folds on the section below :(. However LazyVGrid resizes to show the entire content when the content shrinks with editMode reverting to .inactive Note: If I replace the List with a ScrollView...lazyVGrid resizes perfectly when content increases in editMode = .active....but then I would lose all the Sidebar and List characteristics for the Section below :( Also, looks like .onMove is not supported in LazyVGrids Any pointers to solve the LazyVGrid (embedded in a List) not resizing or expanding when content increases ... will be deeply appreciated. var body: some View {         List {             LazyVGrid(columns: editMode?.wrappedValue == .active ? singleColumn : twoColumns, alignment: .leading, spacing: 10) {                 ForEach(editMode?.wrappedValue == .active ? allDashItems : selectedDashItems) { dashitem in                     DashItemCell(dashitem)                                         }                 .onMove(perform: moveDashItem)                 .environment(\.editMode, editMode)             }             Section(header: Text("Bottom Section")) {                     ForEach (sectionList)&#9;{ item in                         ListItemCell(item)                     }                     .onDelete(perform: deleteFolder)                     .onMove(perform: moveFolder)                 }         }         .listStyle(SidebarListStyle()) }

Description: When initiating the print flow via UIPrintInteractionController, and no printer is initially connected, iOS displays all possible paper sizes in the paper selection UI. However, if a printer connects in the background after this view is shown, the list of paper sizes does not automatically refresh to reflect only the options supported by the connected printer. If the user selects an incompatible paper size (one not supported by the printer that has just connected), the app crashes due to an invalid configuration. Steps to Reproduce: Launch the app and navigate to the print functionality. Tap the Print button to invoke UIPrintInteractionController. At this point, no printer is yet connected. iOS displays all available paper sizes. While the paper selection UI is visible, the AirPrint-compatible printer connects in the background. Without dismissing the controller, the user selects a paper size (e.g., one that is not supported by the printer). The app crashes. Expected Result: App should not crash Once the printer becomes available (connected in the background), the paper size options should refresh automatically. The list should be filtered to only include sizes that are compatible with the connected printer. This prevents the user from selecting an invalid option, avoiding crashes. Actual Result: App crashes The paper size list remains unfiltered. The user can still select unsupported paper sizes. Selecting an incompatible option causes the app to crash, due to a mismatch between UI selection and printer capability.

I have a sample document-based macOS app. I understand that you can open a new window or a new tab with some text. import SwiftUI struct ContentView: View { @Binding var document: TexDocument @Environment(\.newDocument) var newDocument var body: some View { VStack(spacing: 0) { topView } } private var topView: some View { Button { newDocument(TexDocument(text: "A whole new world!")) } label: { Text("Open new window") .frame(width: 200) } } } Suppose that I have a path to a text file whose security-scoped bookmark can be resolved with a click of a button. I wonder if you can open a new window or a new tab with the corresponding content?. I have done that in Cocoa. I hope I can do it in SwiftUI as well. Thanks.

I'm trying to use @Query in a wrapper view around a Button to keep a macOS menu command up to date but I keep getting Set a .modelContext in view's environment to use Query even though @Environment(\.modelContext) private var modelContext is part of the views.

DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM When using SwiftUI’s TextField or TextEditor on iPadOS, a persistent gray or default system material bar appears at the bottom of the screen. This gray bar is not present in Apple’s native apps (such as Notes, Mail, Messages) or in third-party apps like ChatGPT and Beeper STEPS TO REPRODUCE Create a TextField or TextEditor. Run the code, click on it, without software keyboard enabled.

I’m building an app similar to the Files app, where users navigate through folders using a NavigationStack with a bound NavigationPath. I need to display the current path — meaning a breadcrumb-like UI that shows the folder hierarchy the user has drilled down into. However, I’m running into a big limitation: We can’t access the current values inside NavigationPath. It doesn’t conform to Sequence, and there’s no documented way to extract the typed path elements to construct a path string like Documents / MyFolder / Subfolder. To work around this, I tried maintaining a separate [FileItem] array alongside NavigationPath, and that works well in iOS 17+ and iOS 18. But when I test on iOS 16, and navigate to another detail view in my NavigationSplitView, the app crashes. I searched around and found others hit this issue too — switching back to NavigationPath fixes the crash, but now I’m back to square one: I can’t figure out the current folder path from the stack. So my questions are: • Is there any supported way to access the current typed values from NavigationPath in a safe and supported way? • Or is there another Apple-recommended approach for this kind of breadcrumb behavior in apps using NavigationStack? Would really appreciate insight from Apple or anyone who’s solved this cleanly, especially with iOS 16 compatibility in mind. Thanks!

I have something that looks like: NavigationStack { List(self.items, id: \.self, selection: self.$selectedItems) { item in NavigationLink { ItemView(item: item) .environment(\.managedObjectContext, self.viewContext) } label: { LabelWithMenuView(object: item) { ptr in self.labelHandler(item: item, newName: ptr) } } } if self.editMode?.wrappedValue == .active { editButtons } else { TextField("Add Item", text: self.$newItem) .onSubmit { self.addItem() self.newItem = "" } .padding() } } #if os(iOS) .toolbar { EditButton() } .onChange(of: self.editMode?.wrappedValue) { old, new in print("editMode \(old) -> \(new)") } #endif With that layout, the edit button doesn't show up at all; if I put it as part of the List, it does show up, but the first click doesn't do anything; after that, it works, but the onChange handler doesn't show it getting changed, and the editButtons don't go away.

Hi! When building my app using Xcode 16, fast scrolling (using scrollViewProxy.scrollTo) a list would result in items not appearing even when scrolling stopped. This does not happen when the app is built with Xcode 15, even on iOS 18. I'm also getting this error in the logs: List failed to visit cell content, returning an empty cell. - SwiftUICore/Logging.swift:84 - please file a bug report.

I'm wondering what the correct, or recommended, way is to dismiss a SwiftUI that is being presented as a sheet hosted by an NSHostingController. The usual technique of invoking @Environment(\.dismiss) does not appear to work. Consider the code below. An NSWindowController is attempting to display a SwiftUI SettingsView as a sheet. The sheet is correctly presented, but the SettingsView is unable to dismiss itself. I am able to make it work by passing a closure into SettingsView that calls back to the NSWindowController but it's rather convoluted because SettingsView doesn't know the view controller that's hosting it until after SettingsView has been created, which means "finding" that view controller in the window controller to dismiss is more involved than it should be. Is there a better strategy to leverage here? final class MyViewController: NSViewController { @IBAction func buttonClicked(_ sender: NSButton) { if let presenter = window?.contentViewController { presenter.presentAsSheet(NSHostingController(rootView: SettingsView())) } } } struct SettingsView: View { @Environment(\.dismiss) private var dismiss var body: some View { VStack { Button("Cancel", role: .cancel) { dismiss() // This call does not dismiss the sheet. } .keyboardShortcut(.cancelAction) } } } Thank you. macOS 15.4.1 (24E263), Xcode 16.3 (16E140)

Facing issue of NSUserDefaults data got cleared on update new version from app store. so all data of user got cleared and user have to login again. I was having app in store with version 1.1.3 and then we have uploaded new version to store with version 1.1.4 but when user download app from store their data was cleared from UserDefaults.so this is big issue in update. need to help. is that apple updated any process on update. Question How Apple change version build in device when we update app from app store. is it uninstall old build and install new build ? Or it is install new version on old version ? Should UserDefaults.standard will delete on update ? Updating Provisioning profile from manual to automatically cause issue on UserDefaults.standard Like UserDefaults got cleared and uuid will change ? Do we have anythings that we can identify specific user as uniq user ? What is better solution to store login data into SQLite store or in UserDefaults as model ? Will appreciate for your help. this is very big issue and login again on update will make app user more effect